Statistics/Data Analytics Interview Questions
Statistics interviews evaluate concept understanding + business application skills. You should be able to explain “why use this method?” rather than just formulas.
🟢 Sample Questions (3/20)
Question 1. Mean vs Median
[Question] The mean customer purchase amount is 80. Explain the characteristics of this data and which metric to use.
✅ Model Answer
Data Characteristics:
- Mean > Median → Right-skewed distribution
- A small number of high-value purchasers pull up the mean
- Most customers purchase $80 or less
Metric Selection:
- Representative value: Recommended to use median ($80)
- For reporting: Express as “Half of customers purchase $80 or less”
- For revenue forecasting: Use mean (related to total sum)
Additional Analysis:
# Check skewness
from scipy import stats
skewness = stats.skew(df['amount'])
print(f"Skewness: {skewness:.2f}") # Positive means right-skewed
# Check quantiles
print(df['amount'].quantile([0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.9, 0.99]))Interviewer Point:
“When should you use the mean?” → Normal distribution, metrics related to total sum
Question 2. p-value Interpretation
[Question] Explain the meaning of p-value = 0.03. Is the interpretation “there’s a 3% probability the effect exists” correct?
✅ Model Answer
❌ Incorrect Interpretations:
- “There’s a 3% probability the effect exists”
- “There’s a 3% probability the null hypothesis is true”
✅ Correct Interpretation:
“If the null hypothesis is true, the probability of observing the current result (or more extreme results) is 3%”
Simple Explanation:
- “If there really is no effect, this result would only occur 3 times out of 100”
- “Since this is a rare result to be coincidence, we conclude there is an effect”
Limitations of p-value:
- Does not tell us the size of the effect
- Small differences become significant with large sample sizes
- The 0.05 threshold is arbitrary
Interviewer Point:
“What if p-value is 0.051, does that mean there’s no effect?” → Boundary value issue, consider effect size together
Question 3. Type I Error vs Type II Error
[Question] In new drug efficacy testing, which is more serious: Type I error or Type II error?
✅ Model Answer
Definitions:
- Type I Error (α): Concluding there’s an effect when there isn’t (False Positive)
- Type II Error (β): Concluding there’s no effect when there is (False Negative)
Drug Testing:
- Type I Error: Approving an ineffective drug → Patient harm (more serious)
- Type II Error: Rejecting an effective drug → Opportunity cost
Opposite Case - Spam Filter:
- Type I Error: Marking normal email as spam → Missing important emails (more serious)
- Type II Error: Marking spam as normal → Minor inconvenience
Trade-off:
α ↓ (conservative) → β ↑
α ↑ (aggressive) → β ↓Business Application:
- Medical/Safety: Minimize Type I error (α = 0.01)
- Marketing tests: Consider Type II error (power ≥ 80%)
Interviewer Point:
“What is statistical power?” → 1 - β, the probability of detecting a real effect
🔒 Premium Questions (17 Questions)
All 20 Questions Breakdown
| Category | Questions | Main Topics |
|---|---|---|
| 📊 Descriptive Statistics | 5 questions | Mean/Median, Variance, Outlier Detection |
| 🧪 Hypothesis Testing | 7 questions | p-value, Errors, A/B Testing, Multiple Comparison |
| 📈 Regression Analysis | 4 questions | Coefficient Interpretation, Multicollinearity, R² |
| 🎲 Probability/Bayes | 2 questions | Conditional Probability, Simpson’s Paradox |
| 💼 Business | 2 questions | Metric Design, Analysis Cases |
What You’ll Learn in Premium
- ✅ A/B Test Sample Size Calculation: Practical formulas and Python code
- ✅ Multiple Comparison Correction: Bonferroni, FDR methods
- ✅ Statistical vs Practical Significance: Effect size interpretation
- ✅ Multicollinearity Diagnosis: VIF calculation and resolution methods
- ✅ Simpson’s Paradox: Real cases and solutions
- ✅ Answer Points Interviewers Expect
🎯 Purchase All 20 Questions + Explanations
SQL + Pandas + Statistics + Case Study bundle discount
📝 Statistics Interview Must-Know
🎯 Key Concept Summary
| Concept | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| p-value | Probability of observed value or more extreme under H₀ | 0.03 → 3% probability |
| Confidence Interval | Estimated range containing population parameter | 95% CI: [2.1, 3.5] |
| Type I Error | Concluding effect exists when it doesn’t (α) | Approving ineffective drug |
| Type II Error | Concluding no effect when it exists (β) | Rejecting effective drug |
| Power | 1 - β | Ability to detect real effect |
| Effect Size | Magnitude of practical difference | Cohen’s d, h |
🔢 Commonly Used Tests
| Situation | Test Method |
|---|---|
| Compare two means | t-test |
| Compare means of 3+ groups | ANOVA |
| Compare two proportions | z-test, χ² |
| Correlation | Pearson, Spearman |
| Normality test | Shapiro-Wilk |
📝 Practice More for Free
If you need more interview preparation, review the concept sections in the Cookbook: